Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Corporatism, once used to mediate conflict in labour relations and primary production, has emerged in the policy and regulatory networks around the Toronto Stock Exchange. It is a lop-sided corporatism which excludes representative participation by consumers. Corporatism as an explanatory theory once competed with models of pluralism. It is now obscured by new theories in regulatory studies. Corporatism repositions the financial service industries into the context of other competitive and adversarial economic activities regulated by the state. The broad commercially orientated and relationship-decision making of private order stock exchange regulation has been lifted into state and public order regulation through a combination of industry associations and state agencies. Corporatism emphasises in this arrangement the blurring of private and public policy and decision-making and conventional separations of power. It is marked by (1) participants who are willing and able to negotiate agreements and to pressure and persuade others to observe the terms; (2) rewards, advantages or incentives for participants; (3) recurring contexts and situations which brings the participants together, and, (4) distinctive political and legal cultures of the regulatory institutions needed to accommodate it. It draws attention to the broad standards and discretionary decision making which advantage individual major actors and disadvantages minor ones. It emphasises the decision-making by participants who take into account the economic importance of particular transactions and individual actors. The interests of minor actors including retail investors will not be protected, particularly in the absence of a strong and autonomous state regulator. There will be ongoing concern because of the poor fit with public order regulatory principles relating to impartial decision-making. Reactions to further scandal may require industry-based groups to implement policies against their interests. Centre for International Corporate Governance Research. http://www.businessandlaw.vu.edu.au/cicgr/default.asp 4 Casey, John. & Dalton, Bronwen. The Best Of Times, The Worst Of Times: Community Sector Advocacy In The Age Of ‘Compacts’
منابع مشابه
رابطه کیفیت حکمرانی با سلامت در کشورهای منطقه جنوب غربی آسیا
Introduction: The role of good governance as a key to development effectiveness has been emphasized in recent years. It has been argued that merely allocating public resources for the right goods and services may not lead to desirable outcomes if budget institutions–involving the budget formulation, execution and monitoring–are malfunctioning. In a way that merely allocating budget resources fo...
متن کاملGovernance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models
A central problem in designing effective models of provider governance in health systems has been to ensure an appropriate balance between the concerns of public sector and/or government decision-makers, on the one hand, and of non-governmental health services actors in civil society and private life, on the other. In tax-funded European health systems up to the 1980s, the state and other publi...
متن کاملرابطه کیفیت حکمرانی با سلامت در کشورهای منطقه جنوب غربی آسیا
Introduction: The role of good governance as a key to development effectiveness has been emphasized in recent years. It has been argued that merely allocating public resources for the right goods and services may not lead to desirable outcomes if budget institutions–involving the budget formulation, execution and monitoring–are malfunctioning. In a way that merely allocating budget resources fo...
متن کاملEvaluating and revisiting the public government: a policy feedback perspective
Existing models of quality evaluation in public sector are mainly derived from the approaches within private sector. These models which represented by the New Public Management (NPM) paradigm, don&rsquot reflect the fundamental values of public administration, which are the very essence of the discipline and contrasting it from private sector. These core values, such as democratic citizenship, ...
متن کاملNew Provider Models for Sweden and Spain: Public, Private or Non-profit?; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
Sweden and Spain experiment with different provider models to reform healthcare provision. Both models have in common that they extend the role of the for-profit sector in healthcare. As the analysis of Saltman and Duran demonstrates, privatisation is an ambiguous and contested strategy that is used for quite different purposes. In our comment, we emphasize that their analysis leaves questions ...
متن کاملGovernance in Health – The Need for Exchange and Evidence; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
Governance in health is cited as one of the key factors in balancing the concerns of the government and public sector with the interests of civil society/private players, but often remains poorly described and operationalized. Richard Saltman and Antonio Duran look at two aspects in the search for new provider models in a context of health markets signalling liberalisation: (i) the role of the ...
متن کامل